For me a photo is something that sticks with me much longer than words ever can. When I think back on fond memories, I see them visually rather than just focusing on words. So a decade later as the anniversary of 9/11 looms only days away, the photo of “the falling man” is still visually striking and mildly disturbing. There is something about seeing someone falling to their death—especially due to their own choice, like in this photo—that forces people to confront their own fears and question the soundness of their own psyche. Many humans are filled with empathy, that swells when they see photos such as this and it can sometimes lead them into a dark place when asking where a person was mentally located to end their lives. There is something chilling about the delicacy of a human life and how easily we can become the masters of our destiny, such as the reason movies like The Bridge are so controversial.
The question with the photo of the falling man is the same question that was asked of the Fire on Marlborough Street; “Is this unethical to publish due to the sensitivity of the situation at hand?” The main difference between to the two photos is that one is of a man committing suicide, and the other is of two girls accidently falling to their death from a fire escape. The man in the photo cannot be easily identified (his identity is still not confirmed) whereas the girls can, but both subjects of the photos were forced out of buildings to their death due to fire and smoke.
I don’t think it was wrong to publish the photo of the jumping man. That image alone expresses the desperation, and the emotions running through those in the towers. No words could ever explain what that photo can, and it easily represents the effects of terrorism on the country. Unlike with the Fire on Marlborough Street, publishing this photo did not change laws or any type of regulations, but did spark an emotional pull (even if a disturbed pull) and helped people across the world understand the pain and suffering felt on 9/11 if only the feelings of that one man.



















OMGZ FIRST!!!1: Commentary Flubs & Social Media Programs for the Hoarder at Heart
By being in a class about personal branding and maintaining said brand online, obviously most of the curriculum will deal with social media. Step one would be having a presence online, and then the second step would be to maintain your flurry of accounts. Simple enough if you already have a basic amount of
Trillian Screen Capture (click for larger)
presence online, but if not, the amount of new accounts and learning how each website works can be a bit overwhelming. Luckily there are clients such as hootsuite which can kind of lump all of your social media clients together for easy access. Personally though, I haven’t jumped on the hootsuite bandwagon. I opt for co-tweet, which conveniently offers to shorten URL’s instead of going to outside sites such as tinyurl or bit.ly. Which for someone who frequently links via twitter, that’s awesome. But for keeping my e-mails, IM clients, and facebook synced, I use Trillian. With Trillian you can IM from all of your IM clients, and Facebook with one application. When I get a new e-mail I get a pop-up notification in the corner of my screen (kind of like with gtalk). I feel like as of right now, I don’t have a need for Hootsuite, but a lot of my classmates have adapted to it like birds to the weather change (is running away of the cold considered adapting?).
Recently in class we’ve been focusing most on our efforts towards Twitter and (obviously) wordpress. Very little emphasis is really put on Facebook, and I believe it’s because most people use that strictly as a private forum for communication with friends.
And on the Topic of WordPress:
Scott Stratten
Scott Stratten of UNmarketing fame actually wrote a blog about the “five words that kill your blog.” I’m in a class with 20+ people who for the majority are new to blogging and subsequently, new to wordpress. For those who don’t know, wordpress automatically will have your settings so that your comments have to continuously be approved. Guess what? If I have to wait for my comments to be moderated, I will not come back or comment on your blog any further.
Want to change it?
Go to your dashboard on WordPress, scroll down to your settings and then click discussion. Uncheck the box in front of “comment author must have a previously approved comment.” BAM! Then you’re done once you’ve saved those bitchin’ settings for all comments to have a sweet sail off to the island of un-moderated commentary.
"UNCHECK MEEE!" The box screams aloud...
And Speaking of Commentary…
When commenting on someone else’s blog it is very important to make sure your points are valid. Commenting something like “good post, can’t wait to read more” will not garner any attention from fellow viewers. Feel free to add your own insight! Of course, this isn’t to say that giving kudos isn’t a horrible thing though. Everyone needs a little virtual pat on the back here and there. But your comments are a chance to essentially market your own blog to a new audience, so make it count.
Need some help on what constitutes a “good” blog comment?
Don’t worry, I’ve got you covered.
→ 5 Comments
Posted in COM38600
Tagged commenting, higher education, hootsuite, personal branding, Scott Stratten, social media, trillian, twitter, UNmarketing, wordpress